Giá nhôm tấm tuần 41/2026: SMM A00 rơi về 23.650 CNY/tấn sau lễ
Sàn Thượng Hải mở cửa lại sau Quốc khánh với hai phiên giảm liền: giá nhôm thỏi SMM A...
On September 4, 2025, the British Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) formally questioned Mercuria Energy Group Ltd., a Swiss commodities trader, regarding its substantial aluminium holdings on the London Metal Exchange (LME). This move comes amidst growing concerns that Mercuria's dominant position has distorted prices and created a lack of transparency in the aluminium market, particularly for short-dated contracts. This event not only highlights the complex role of large commodity traders but also raises critical questions about the integrity and regulation of global metals markets.
Since May 2025, Mercuria has amassed an astonishing amount, holding over 90% of all aluminium warrants on the LME. As of early September, this figure exceeded 421,000 tons. In mid-2025, Mercuria's aluminium holdings even reached higher figures, ranging between 600,000 and 800,000 tons. Aluminium warrants are documents that confer ownership of physical aluminium stored in LME warehouses.
This overwhelming position has had significant market repercussions:
The FCA's inquiry aims to understand the rationale behind Mercuria's dominant position, its intended use of the metal, and its future plans for these holdings. This investigation likely stems from complaints from brokers or banks, or from the LME referring the matter to the FCA.
In response to market concerns, the LME has taken additional steps to mitigate risks associated with Mercuria's holdings. Notably, Mercuria was compelled to loan out parts of its massive aluminium position to other traders to ease supply squeeze risks. This occurred after its position in the June 2025 contract was reportedly larger than the available aluminium inventories in LME warehouses, which themselves were largely owned by Mercuria, making delivery by counterparties problematic at contract expiry.
The Mercuria case has exposed gaps in the LME's existing rules. Current regulations primarily cover short-term contracts and dominant inventory positions but have proven insufficient to address larger monthly contracts with later expiries. This has prompted direct engagement by both the FCA and the LME to prevent market disorder.
Market analysts anticipate that this event will lead to increased regulatory scrutiny and potential policy changes by both the FCA and the LME to better control dominant positions in the aluminium market and possibly other metals. Heightened oversight of major commodity traders expanding into metals markets is inevitable.
Conclusion: The FCA's inquiry into Mercuria's LME aluminium holdings serves as a potent reminder of the need for robust regulations and continuous oversight in commodity markets. It underscores the delicate balance between allowing open market activity and ensuring orderly price formation, as well as guaranteeing physical access for all market participants. Investors and technical experts should closely monitor these developments, as they could reshape the structure and operation of the precious metals market in the future.